05

Talk

Page 5 of 5

These are earlier cards, kept as text. Pictures and short summaries stay only while a card is on the first page; the link goes to the original either way.

Source Hacker News
AI usage patterns in software teams

188 points112 comments

no limits stated4.6k words

What we saw

This source gives a title and a link, nothing to quote.

Published 2026-08-18

Fetched 2026-08-20 07:11 UTC · 501cc28e55410d6b

Torn from — the page itself

Thread ↗
Source Hacker News
fx :Tiny, open, native coding agent.

263 points113 comments

no limits stated364 words

What we saw

This source gives a title and a link, nothing to quote.

Published 2026-08-18

Fetched 2026-08-20 07:11 UTC · 2be4b689fb5fbdae

Torn from — the page itself

Thread ↗
Source Hacker News
Norway should buy OpenAI

256 points268 comments

What we saw

This source gives a title and a link, nothing to quote.

Published 2026-08-18

Fetched 2026-08-20 07:11 UTC · cbcad65baecfa6cd

Thread ↗

Papers, repos, models, blogs, Reddit and podcasts — once a day, by machine. Everything collected gets taken apart once — the README, the abstract, the model card — and what that turns up is kept for good, whether or not it becomes a card. Titles and links go to the original; nothing is reproduced here.

The grey line on each card is what the teardown found, not what the source advertises: the licence, the last commit, the model it was built on, whether the paper states its own limits. Open “What we saw” to check what was read to get it. Where it says listing only, the original could not be read — some sites refuse us, and we do not pretend otherwise.

Each card keeps the sentence we actually read at the moment we read it, plus a fingerprint of the response we received. That sentence — not the whole page — is what we can still stand behind if the original later changes or disappears.